Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Utilization of Different Fiber Feedstuffs in Poultry

Abbas Ali, Rizwan Zaheer, Hassan Anees, Tayyab Farooq

Abstract


The difficulty of using high fiber raw materials and ways to improve their nutrient availability is always a hot topic. However, fiber is functionally important for poultry performance, health, and welfare. Although some fiber is indigestible, it plays an important role in the digestive system. It influences gizzard function as well as digesta passage rate. The latest researches precisely recommend 3–4% crude fiber for poultry for a greater period while 5% crude fiber could be applied for commercial layers. Providing enough fiber to laying hens has been shown to minimize feather pecking. The study also presents technical options to fiber impacts such as improvements in poultry and livestock and nutrition management also reduces the feed cost. However, we concluded that 10% replacement value of maize with wheat offal resulted in optimum growth performance of the broiler chickens.


Keywords


Broiler chickens, chicken, fiber, soya bean hull, poultry and livestock

Full Text:

PDF

References


McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA. Animal Nutrition. 6th Edn. UK: Pearson, Prentice Hall; 2002.

Ning H, Xiaowen F, Na D, Shengping H, Haibing C, Yuming G. Comparative study of digestive performance on dietary fibres in emus, turkeys and cocks. Journal of China Agricultural University. 2003; 5: 105–109.

Wang Z, Cerrate S, Coto C, Yan C, Waldroup PW. Utilization of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) in broiler diets using a standardized nutrient matrix. Int J Poult Sci. 2007; 6(7): 470–477.

Villamide MJ, San Juan LD. Effect of chemical composition of sunflower seed meal on its true metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility. Poult Sci. 1998; 77(12): 1884–1892.

Choct M, Hughes RJ, Wang J, Bedford MR, Morgan AJ, Annison G. Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the anti-nutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens. Br Poult Sci. 1996; 37(3): 609–621.

Langout DJ. The Role of Intestinal Flora as Affected by Non-Starch Polysaccharides in Broiler Chicks. [PhD Thesis]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University; 1998. p. 162.

Smith CHM, Annison G. Non-starch plant polysaccharides in broiler nutrition: towards a physiologically valid approach to their determination. World’s Poult Sci J. 1996; 52(2): 203–221.

Hall MB. Challenges with non-fiber carbohydrate methods. J Anim. Sci. 2003; 81(12): 3226–3232.

Krogdahl A. Antinutrients affecting digestive functions and performance in poultry. Proceedings of the 7th European Poultry Conference. Paris. 1986. pp. 239–248.

Rogel AM, Balnave D, Bryden WL, Annison EF. Improvement of raw potato starch digestion in chickens by feeding oat hulls and other fibrous feed ingredients. Aust J Agric Res. 1987a; 38(3): 629–637.

Rogel AM, Balnave D, Bryden WL, Annison EF. The digestion of wheat starch in broiler chickens. Aust J Agric Res. 1987b; 38(3): 639–649.

Hughes BO, Duncan IJ. The influence of line and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. Br Poult Sci. 1972; 13(6): 525–547.

Lynd LR, Wyman CE, Gerngross TU. Biocommodity engineering. Biotechnol Prog. 1999; 15(5): 777–793.

Daniel WW. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Health Sciences. 5th Edn. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company; 1995.

Steel TGO, Torrie LH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company; 1980.

Abe HA, Kimura T, Yamuchi K. Effect of collagen on toughness of meat spent from laying hens. J Food Sci Technol. 1996; 43(7): 831–834.

Kornegay ET. Soybean hulls for growing, finishing swine. Feedstuffs. May, 1978; 24–26.

Mitaru BN, Blair R, Reichert RD, Roe WE. Dark and yellow rapeseed hulls, soybean hulls and a purified fiber source: their effects on dry matter, energy, protein and amino acid digestibilities in cannulated pigs. J Anim. Sci. 1984; 59(6): 1510–1518.

Kornegay ET. Soybean hull digestibility by sows and feeding value for growing finishing swine. J Anim. Sci. 1981; 53(1): 138–145.

Esonu BO. Performance and internal organ characteristics of weaned rabbit fed graded levels of dietary soybean hulls. JOTEN 3. 1998; (1 & 2): 28–33.

Esonu BO, Etuk EB, Ezeigbo OO. Determination of optimal dietary levels of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) hulls for broilers. JOTEN 2. 1997; (1 & 2): 76–82.

Preston RL. Typical composition of feed of cattle and sheep 1989–90. Feedstuffs. 1989; 61: 19–33.

Acamovic T. Commercial application of enzymes technology for poultry production. World’s Poul Sci J. 2001; 57(3): 225–236.

Aderolu AZ, Iyaye EA, Onilude AA. Changes in the nutritional value of rice husk during trichodermviride degradation. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2007; 13(5): 583–589.

Annison G, Choct M. Anti-nutritive activities of cereal non-starch polysaccharides in broiler diets and strategies minimizing their effects. World’s Poult Sci J. 1991; 47(3): 232–242.

Scheiderier S, Abudabos A. Enzyme supplementation in corn/soy-based layer diet. The Nebraska Poultry Report. 1998; 12–13.

Ofongo ST, Saska K, Iyaye EA, Sudekum K. Rice mill feed: an agroindustrial by-product with potential for rural development. Proceedings of the International Tropentag Conference. University of Hohenhiem, Stuttgart, Germany. 2008, Oct. 6–10.

Adeola O, Olukosi OA. Opportunities and challenges in the use of alternative feedstuffs in poultry production. Proceedings of the 3rd Nigerian International Poultry Summit. Abeokuta, Nigeria. 2009, Feb. 22–26. pp. 45–54.

Anigbogu NM, Anosike JC. Zymomonas mobilis degraded and sweetened sawdust (Life-enzyme) cake as feed for the goats. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition (IJAN). 2010; 27(1): 50–55.

Anigbogu NM, Ibe SN, Anosike JC, Assam EM. The effect of life enzyme (Sawdust treated with Zymomonas mobilis) on the performance characteristics of red sokoto goats. J Sustain Agric Environ. 2009; 11(1): 12–18.

Faulkner DB, Hummel DF, Buskirk DD, Berger LL, Parrett DF, Cmarik GF. Performance and nutrient metabolism by nursing calves supplemented with limited or unlimited corn or soy hulls. J Anim. Sci. 1994; 72(2): 470–477.

Habibi Z. Practical Methods of Chemistry Laboratory. Tehran: Shahrab Press; 1999. pp. 403–407.

Blasi DA, Drouillard J, Titgemeyer EC, Paisley SI, Brouk MJ. Soybean Hulls: Composition and Feeding Value for Beef and Dairy Cattle. Kansas State University; Jan 2000.

De Camp SA, Hill B, Hankins SL, Herr CT, Richert BT, Sutton AL, Kelly DT, Cobb ML, Bundy DW, Powers WJ. Effects of Soybean Hulls on Pig Performance, Manure Composition, and Air Quality. Purdue University Swine Research Repository; 2001.

Christopher GI, Offfiong S, Idiong CI. Effect of the replacement of maize with wheat offal in broiler finisher diets on growth performance and feed cost. J Cent Eur Agric. 2007; 8(1): 33–38.

Oso AO, Akapo O, Sanwo KA, Bamgbose AM. Utilization of unpeeled cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) root meal supplemented with or without charcoal by broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2014; 98(3): 431–438.

IITA. An Annual Report on Cassava Production. 2012; pp. 4–6.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.