Journal Reading Preferences among Ophthalmologists: A Study in India

Authors

  • Govindarajan Ramadoss Librarian, Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Dhanavandan Deputy Librarian and Head, Central Library, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India

Keywords:

Journal reading preferences, ophthalmologists, journal characteristics, information seeking behavior

Abstract

Background: Scientific journals provide evidences and facilitate to build the core knowledge in a professional field. Ophthalmologists/eye doctors working in academic eye hospitals read journals to do evidence-based practice, research, and teach. The purpose of this study is to determine journal reading preferences among those ophthalmologists. Methodology: The study design is cross-sectional and convenience sampling method is adopted. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. SPSS 18 PASW Statistical package was used for statistical analysis. Frequencies, percentages, Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Factor Analysis, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used in the study. Findings: Around 633 ophthalmologists working in 47 academic eye hospitals from 16 states of India were included in the study. The study results revealed that the majority of the ophthalmologists prefer to read journals based on subject relevance. The statistical test results showed up that there exists a significant difference between ophthalmologists’ journal reading preferences and experience. The two major factors of journal reading preferences of ophthalmologists were cognitive preferences and affective preferences. The cognitive preference was significantly higher than the affective preferences. Conclusion: The ophthalmic librarians should give importance to subjects of the journal and build the resource collection. The Journal publishers should understand the ophthalmologists’ need and revive their scope of their journals or promote quality articles on subjects. The information service providers like online databases should ensure to index journals in a wide range of subjects and provide good information retrieval options like subject filters to the ophthalmologists.

References

King DW, Tenopir C, Montgomery CH, Aerni SE. Patterns of Journal Use by Faculty at Three Diverse Universities. D-lib Magazine. 2003; 9(10): 1–10p.

Tenopir C, King DW, Clarke MT, Na K, Zhou X. Journal Reading Patterns and Preferences of Pediatricians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007; 95(1): 56p.

Tenopir C, King DW, Edwards S, Wu L. Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns. In: Aslib Proceedings, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Jan 2009; 61(1): 5-32p.

Ru B, Wang X, Yao L. Evaluation of the Informatician Perspective: Determining Types of Research Papers Preferred by Clinicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017; 17(2): 74p.

Savolainen R. The Interplay of Affective and Cognitive Factors in Information Seeking and Use: Comparing Kuhlthau’s and Nahl’s Models. J Doc. 2015; 71(1): 175–197p.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-07

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Research Article

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.