Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Treatment of Wastewater with Acid and Alkaline Modified Coconut Fiber Carbon

Nwamadi C. J, Wami E. N., Dagde K. K.

Abstract


The thrust of this study is to investigate the effect of acid and alkaline modified coconut fibre carbon for Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) waste water treatment. The Coconut fibre were obtained as an agrowaste material from Ahiankwo Market in Umuoyoro, Omuma L.G.A, Rivers State, Nigeria while the LNG waste water was sourced from Greenvile LNG plant in Rumuji, Emohua L.G.A, Rivers state, Nigeria. The coconut fiber was carbonized, chemically activated using HCL and NaOH solutions, and assessed for conventional parameters of activated carbon, including bulk density, porosity, pore volume, ash content, moisture content, pH, and particle size. In the subsequent adsorption tests, where the primary goal is the removal of suspended and dissolved Particles (SDP), the activated carbons were utilized to treat the LNG waste water. Total Dissolved Solids, Total Suspended Solids, Total Hardness, Turbidity, Oil content, and pH were the SDP parameters examined. The impact of the process parameters (such as carbon dosage and contact time, particle size, concentration, pH, and concentration) on the percent removal of the SDPs was also investigated and evaluated. It was determined that while carbon dosage and contact time showed a positive correlation with the percent removal of the SDPs, the opposite was true for particle size, pH, and concentration. However, in general, the acid activated carbon treated waste water samples had water treatment parameter values better than those for the alkaline activated carbon treated waste water samples, showing that acid is a better chemical activating agent to be used for the activation of coconut coir agro-waste, for this purpose. The foregoing was corroborated with the plot of Freundlich Isotherm when fitted against the linear models, a correlation coefficient of 0.986 and 0.982 was obtained for the acid and alkaline activated carbon treated waste water samples respectively. This further proves that the acid activated carbon served for a better purification agent than the alkaline activated carbon. Findings from this study can be used by LNG plants operating in our Nigerian environment (where these agro-waste are abundant) for the purification of their effluent before discharge into the immediate environment in the pursuit of the new millennium environmental preservation to leave his environment better than the way he met it.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Dias JM, Alvim-Ferraz MC, Almeida MF, Rivera-Utrilla J, Sánchez-Polo M. Waste materials for activated carbon preparation and its use in aqueous-phase treatment: a review. Journal of environmental management. 2007; 85(4): 833-46.

Tay JH, Chen XG, Jeyaseelan S, Graham N. Optimising the preparation of activated carbon from digested sewage sludge and coconut husk. Chemosphere. 2001; 44(1): 45-51.

Buah W, MacCarthy J, Ndur S. Conversion of corn cobs waste into activated carbons for adsorption of heavy metals from minerals processing wastewater. International Journal of Environmental

Protection and Policy. 2016; 4(4): 98-103.

Bentil, J. &Buah, W. K. “Effects of Physical Activation Procedure on the Production Yield, Surface Chemistry and Surface Pores of Coconut Shells Based Activated Carbons’’, Chemistry and Material Research, 2017; 9, 3, 29-35.

Mohammed, A. R., Mohammad, M. & Darzi, G. N. “Preparation of Carbon Molecular Size from Lignocellulosic Biomass”, A Renewable and Sustainable, Energy Reviews,2010; Vol. 14, 6, 169-181.

Park SJ, Kim YM. Adsorption behaviors of heavy metal ions onto electrochemically oxidized activated carbon fibers. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2005;391(1-2):121-3.

Kılıç M, Apaydın-Varol E, Pütün AE. Preparation and surface characterization of activated carbons from Euphorbia rigida by chemical activation with ZnCl2, K2CO3, NaOH and H3PO4. Applied

surface science. 2012; 261: 247-54.

Vijayan, S. N., Makeshkumar, M. & Sridhar, K., (2012). “Physical and Chemical Analysis of Activated Carbon Prepared from Coconut Shell Charcoal and Usage- A Case Study”, International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Technology, 3, 168-175.

Quartey, E. T. & Chylkova, J. (2013). “Challenges and Opportunities in Managing Agricultural Waste in Ghana”, Advances in Environment, Biotechnology and Biomedicine, 235-239. Effects of Steam Dosage on the Qualities of Activated Carbon Developed from Coconut Shells in Ghana

International Journal of Mining Science (IJMS) with ZnCl2, K2CO3, NaOH and H3PO4”, Applied Science, 261, 247-254.

Asadullah, M., Rahman, M. A., Motin, M. A. & Sultan, M. B. (2007). “Adsorption Studies on Activated Carbon Derived from Steam Activation of Jute Stick Char”, Journal of Surface Technology, 23, 1-2, 73-80.

Ademiluyi, F. T., Amadi, S. A., & Amakama, N. J. (2010). Adsorption and treatment of organic contaminants using activated carbon from waste Nigerian bamboo. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 13, 39-47.

Menkiti M.C., Aneke M.C., Ejikeme P.M., Onukwuli O.D. & Menkiti N.U. (2014). Adsorptive treatment of brewery effluent using activated Chrysophyllumalbidium seed shell carbon. SpringerPlus 2014, 3:213.

Yorgun S. & Yildiz D. (2015). Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from paulownia wood by chemical activation with H3PO4. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 53, 122.

Sivakumar P., Palanisamy P.N. (2009). Adsorption studies of basic red 29 by a non-conventional activated carbon prepared from Euphorbia antiquorum L., Internationa. J ChemTechnol Res 1(3):502–510.

Yeddou N. & Bensmaili A. (2005). Kinetic models for the sorption of dye from aqueous solution by clay-wood sawdust mixture. Desalination 185:499–508.

Ahmedna, M., Marshall, W. E. & Rao, R.M. (2000). Production of granular activated carbons from select agricultural byproducts and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption properties.

Biosource Technology, 71, 113-123.

Ayawei, N., Ebelegi, A.N. and Wankasi, D. (2017). Modelling and Interpretation of Adsorption Isotherms, Journal of Chemistry, 1-11.

Manju G.N., Raji C., Anirudhan T.S. (1998). Evaluation of coconut husk carbon for the removal of arsenic from water, Water Res. 32 (10), 3062-3070.

Iqbaldin, M. N. M., Khudzir, I., Azlan, M. I. M., Zaidi, A. G., Surani, B. and Zubri, Z. (2013). “Properties of Coconut Shell Activated Carbon”, Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 25, 4, 497-503.

Dada, A. O., Olalekan, A. P. & Olatunya, A. M. (2012). Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich Isotherms Studies of Equilibrium Sorption of Zn2+ Unto Phosphoric Acid Modified Rice Husk, IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry, 3, 38-45.

Danish, M., Hashim, R., M.N.M. Ibrahim & Sulaiman, O. (2014). Optimized preparation for large surface area activated carbon from date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) stone biomass. Biomass Bioenerg. 61, 167.

Diao, Y., Walawender, W.P. & Fan, L.T. (2002). “Activated carbons prepared from phosphoric acid activation of grain sorghum,” Bioresource Technology, 81 (1), 45–52.

Gao, X.Y., Wu, L., Xu, Q., Tian, W., Li, Z.Y. & Kobayashi, N. (2018). Adsorption kinetics and mechanisms of copper ions on activated carbons derived from pinewood sawdust by fast H3PO4activation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 7907.

Huang Y. & Zhao G. (2016). Preparation and characterization of activated carbon fibers from liquefied wood by KOH activation. Holz- forschung 70: 195–202. https ://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-0051

Menéndez-Díaz, J. A. & Martín-Gullón, I. (2006). Types of carbon Adsorbents and their Production: Published in Activated Carbon Surfaces in Environmental Remediation (Interface Science and Technology, Series, 7) Bandosz, T., Ed. Elsevier, 1-48.

Yahya, M. A., Al-Qodah, Z., & Ngah, C.W.Z. (2015). Agricultural Bio-waste Materials as Potential Sustainable Precursors used for Activated Carbon Production: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 46, 218–235.

Zhu J., Yang J. & Deng B. (2010). Ethylenediamine-modified activated car- bon for aqueous lead adsorption. Environ ChemLett 8: 277–282. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1031 1-009-0217-y


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.