Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Polyphenol Recovery Using Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration: A Review

Sakshi Sharma

Abstract


A viable strategy to lessen the environmental contamination of numerous by-products is pressuredriven membrane-based technology. The recovery, isolation, and separation of polyphenols from such by-products has recently received attention due to the growing interest in natural chemicals having biological activity. The potential to recover phenolics from various kinds of by-products has been observed particularly for tight filtration process and nanofiltration membranes. These membranes' productivity and ability to separate substances are influenced by several variables, including the material of the membrane, the molecular weight cut-off, and the operating environment. One pressure-driven filtration membrane technology that has recently gained popularity is nanofiltration. Both diffusion controlled and convective fluxes take place during transit across the membrane because of the membrane's porosity and the pressure difference inside the cell. Naturally, the external boundary layer on the feed side may also experience the same transport flux. An analysis of the impact of these variables on the extraction of phenolic compounds by-products utilizing impermeable ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes is presented. The information from the literature is examined and debated regarding the ways that molecules are separated, how membranes function, and other process phenomena. To encourage the deployment of system components for the synthesis of active phenolic formulations that may be useful as food antioxidants, current methods for extracting phenolics from raw resources are also introduced.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cassano A, Conidi C, Ruby-Figueroa R, Castro-Muñoz R. Nanofiltration and tight ultrafiltration membranes for the recovery of polyphenols from agro-food by-products. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2): 351.

Guo S, Wan Y, Chen X, Luo J. Loose nanofiltration membrane custom-tailored for resource recovery. Chem Eng J. 2021; 409: 127376.

Galanakis CM. Separation of functional macromolecules and micromolecules: from ultrafiltration to the border of nanofiltration. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2015; 42(1): 44–63.

Lan Q, Feng C, Ou K, Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu T. Phenolic membranes with tunable sub-10-nm pores for nanofiltration and tight-ultrafiltration. J Membrane Sci. 2021; 640: 119858.

Castro-Muñoz R, Conidi C, Cassano A. Membrane-based technologies for meeting the recovery of biologically active compounds from foods and their by-products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019; 59(18): 2927–2948.

Yadav D, Karki S, Ingole PG. Nanofiltration (NF) membrane processing in the food industry. Food Eng Rev. 2022; 14: 579–595.

Papaioannou EH, Mazzei R, Bazzarelli F, Piacentini E, Giannakopoulos V, Roberts MR, Giorno L. Agri-food industry waste as resource of chemicals: the role of membrane technology in their sustainable recycling. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3): 1483.

Giacobbo A, Moura Bernardes A, Filipe Rosa MJ, De Pinho MN. Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration/nanofiltration for the recovery of polyphenols from winery wastewaters. Membranes. 2018; 8(3): 46.

Mondor M, Plamondon P, Drolet H. Valorization of agri-food by-products from plant sources using pressure-driven membrane processes to recover value-added compounds: opportunities and challenges. Food Rev Int. 2022; 7: 1–25.

Cifuentes-Cabezas M, Carbonell-Alcaina C, Vincent-Vela MC, Mendoza-Roca JA, ÁlvarezBlanco S. Comparison of different ultrafiltration membranes as first step for the recovery of phenolic compounds from olive-oil washing wastewater. Process Saf Environ Protect. 2021; 149:

–734


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.