The Impact of Temperature and Pressure on the Efficiency of Thermodynamic Processes in Power Generation

Authors

  • Tanushka Singh Chauhan Student, Department of Biosciences, IMS College (Ghaziabad), Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

A subfield of physics called thermodynamics studies how heat interacts with other types of energy. It plays a crucial role in power generation, where the conversion of heat energy into mechanical energy and eventually into electrical energy is carried out. Temperature and pressure are just two of the many variables that affect how efficiently thermodynamic processes produce electricity. This article aims to provide an overview of the impact of temperature and pressure on the efficiency of thermodynamic processes in power generation. Temperature is a crucial factor that affects the efficiency of thermodynamic processes. The amount of heat required to produce a specific amount of work depends on the temperature at which the process is carried out. High temperatures are necessary for power generation to boost the effectiveness of thermodynamic processes. This is because the thermal efficiency of a power generation process is directly proportional to the temperature at which it is carried out. However, there are practical limitations to the maximum temperature that can be used, as the materials used in power plants may not be able to withstand extremely high temperatures. Pressure also plays a crucial role in the efficiency of thermodynamic processes in power generation. The amount of work that can be done with a gas depends on its pressure. The pressure in a power plant is typically maintained at a high level to increase the efficiency of thermodynamic processes. A high-pressure system allows for more work to be extracted from a given amount of heat. However, the pressure in a power plant must be carefully controlled, as changes in pressure can result in damage to the equipment used in the plant.

References

Parrondo JM, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T. Thermodynamics of information. Nat Phys. 2015; 11(2):131–139.

Lewis GN, Randall M, Pitzer KS, Brewer L. Thermodynamics. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications; 2020

Vetter C, Wiemer HJ, Kuhn D. Comparison of sub-and supercritical organic Rankine cycles for power generation from low-temperature/low-enthalpy geothermal wells, considering specific net power output and efficiency. Appl Thermal Eng. 2013; 51(1–2): 871–879.

Lin S, Yip NY, Cath TY, Osuji CO, Elimelech M. Hybrid pressure retarded osmosis–membrane distillation system for power generation from low-grade heat: thermodynamic analysis and energy efficiency. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(9): 5306–5313.

Ibrahim TK, Basrawi F, Awad OI, Abdullah AN, Najafi G, Mamat R, Hagos FY. Thermal performance of gas turbine power plant based on exergy analysis. Appl Thermal Eng. 2017; 115:977–985.

Şahin AD, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Thermodynamic analysis of wind energy. Int J Energy Res. 2006; 30(8): 553–566.

Shah K, Moghtaderi B, Zanganeh J, Wall T. Integration options for novel chemical looping air separation (ICLAS) process for oxygen production in oxy-fuel coal fired power plants. Fuel. 2013; 107: 356–370.

Khan MN, Tlili I. New advancement of high performance for a combined cycle power plant: thermodynamic analysis. Case Stud Thermal Eng. 2018; 12: 166–175.

Bhattacharya A, Manna D, Paul B, Datta A. Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: energy and exergy based performanceanalysis. Energy. 2011; 36(5): 2599–2610.

Ehyaei MA, Ahmadi A, Rosen MA, Davarpanah A. Thermodynamic optimization of a geothermal power plant with a genetic algorithm in two stages. Processes. 2020; 8(10): 1277.

Hosseini SE, Barzegaravval H, Wahid MA, Ganjehkaviri A, Sies MM. Thermodynamic assessment of integrated biogas-based micro-power generation system. Energy Conversion Manage. 2016; 128: 104–119.

Zhou Y, Li S, Sun L, Zhao S, Talesh SS. Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic

Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures. Energy. 2020; 194: 116785.

Sengupta S, Datta A, Duttagupta S. Exergy analysis of a coal‐based 210 MW thermal power plant. Int J Energy Res. 2007; 31(1): 14–28.

Bozorgian A. Analysis and simulating recuperator impact on the thermodynamic performance of the combined water-ammonia cycle. Prog Chem Biochem Res. 2020; 3(2): 169–179.

Altun AF, Kilic M. Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant. Renewable Energy. 2020; 148: 261–274

Downloads

Published

2023-02-09

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Review Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.