Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Farmers’ Awareness of Bean Ascochyta Blight and Evaluation of Constraints of Bean Production in Rwanda.

Clement Urinzwenimana, Rob Melis, Julia Sibiya

Abstract


The awareness and perceptions of ascochyta blight by farmers is an important factor that affects the type of bean genotype adopted. Although farmers in Rwanda prefer large-seeded bean genotypes both for consumption and for market, these genotypes are susceptible to ascochyta blight. It was observed that farmers are abandoning large-seeded bean genotypes in preference for smaller seeded genotypes which seem to be more resistant. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess farmers’ awareness and perceptions of bean farmers on the influence of ascochyta on the type of bean genotypes being grown. A participatory study was conducted in the districts of Burera and Musanze in northern Rwanda, Kamonyi in southern and Rwamagana in eastern Rwanda, during February- November, 2021. In addition, ascochyta severity and incidence in beans was assessed over two seasons - 2020 & 2021. The study revealed that diseases were the most important bean production constraints. Based on the visual symptoms in the bean fields visited as a whole, and on the leave and pods of plants sampled per field, there were more ascochyta infection during season B than season A. Generally the incidence of ascochyta was highest in northern Rwanda where, in some villages, such as Busogo and Rwerere, all the bean fields visited had ascochyta symptoms. Bean growers were able to identify bean ascochyta, but control measures taken were insignificant, probably due to the lack of knowledge and resources. The disease was associated with excessive rainfall and many other environmental factors, as well as poor crop management practices. Varietal preferences were based on yielding ability, early maturity, marketability, diseases and drought tolerance. Other factors considered important included, taste, climbing growth habit, cooking time, large seed size and seed colour. Generally, large-seeded bean varieties were the most preferred in both regions. Farmers that preferred the small-seeded bean genotypes based their preferences on the ability to resist pests and diseases and ability to thrive under harsh environments such as excessive rainfall, drought and mist. However, the large-seeded climbing and red mottled kidney beans genotypes though susceptible to ascochyta, were the most popular bean varieties grown both for consumption and sale in the northern and eastern regions, respectively. This therefore indicated the need to develop bean genotypes that have the qualities of the large-seeded genotypes but are resistant or tolerant to disease such as ascochyta blight.

Full Text:

PDF

References


MINAGRI. 2014. Annual Report Fiscal Year 2013/2014.Kigali. 9-21.https://docs.igihe.com/IMG/pdf/government_annual_report_fy_2013-2014.pdf

FAOSTAT. (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). 2013. Statistics division.http://faostat.fao.org/site/642/default.aspx.

ISAR. 2011. http://arsftfbean.uprm.edu/bic/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/BIC_2011_volume_54.pdf

Schwartz HF, Steadman JR. White mold. p.. HF Schwartz and MA Pastor Corrales (ed.) Bean production problems in the tropics. CIAT, Cali, Colombia. White mold. p. 211–230. In HF

Schwartz and MA Pastor Corrales (ed.) Bean production problems in the tropics. 2nd ed. CIAT, Cali, Colombia. 1989;211–230.

Publications. Rab.gov.rw. 2023. Available from: https://www.rab.gov.rw/publications?tx_filelist_filelist%5Baction%5D=list&tx_filelist_filelist%5

Bcontroller%5D=File&tx_filelist_filelist%5Bpath%5D=%2Fuser_upload%2FRAB%2FPublications%2FReports%2F&cHash=106b8e94f3ca61a27284684d5dc84c6e

Mukankusi C. Improving resistance to Fusarium root rot [Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. sp. phaseoli (Burkholder) W.C. ResearchGate. unknown; 2008. Available from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277183640_Improving_resistance_to_Fusarium_root_rot_Fusarium_solani_Mart_Sacc_f_sp_phaseoli_Burkholder_WC_Snyder_HN_Hans_in_commonbean_Phaseolus_vulgaris_L

Morris ML, Bellon MR. Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica. 2004 Apr;136(1):21-35.

Ceccarelli S, Grando S. Increasing the efficiency of breeding through farmer participation. Ethics and Equity in conservation. 1997.116-121.

Fufa F, Grando S, Kafawin O, Shakhatreh Y, Ceccarelli S. Efficiency of farmers' selection in a participatory barley breeding programme in Jordan. Plant breeding. 2010 Apr;129(2):156-61.

Danial D, Parlevliet J, Almekinders C, Thiele G. Farmers’ participation and breeding for durable disease resistance in the Andean region. Euphytica. 2007 Feb;153:385-96.

Ojwang’ PP, Melis R, Songa JM, Githiri M, Bett C. Participatory plant breeding approach for host plant resistance to bean fly in common bean under semi-arid Kenya conditions. Euphytica.

;170:383-93.

Mugisha CM. Improving resistance to Fusarium root rot [Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. sp. phaseoli (Burkholder) WC Snyder & HN Hans] in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

(Doctoral dissertation).2008.

Sperling, Louise, and Peggy Berkowitz. "Partners in selection: Bean breeders and women bean experts in Rwanda." (1994)..

January 2014 ALLIANCE FOR A GREEN REVOLUTION IN AFRICA Rapid Assessment: Improving smallholder productivity through the adoption of climbing bean varieties and

associated agroforestry benefits in four districts in Rwanda FINAL REPORT RAPID ASSESSMENT OF CLIMBING BEAN PROJECT -FINAL REPORT Executive Summary. 2014.Available from: https://agra.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Rapid-Assessment-of-the-Rwanda-

Climbing-Bean-Project-Jan-2014.pdf

Farley C. Participatory research for improved agroecosystem management: Proceedings of a synthesis workshop, Nazreth, Ethiopia, 1998,17-21.

Chambers, R.. Challenging the professions. Frontiers For Rural Development. Intermediate Technology Publications, London. 1993,pp.xvi + 143pp.

Jenkinson, D. S., and A. E. Johnston. "Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1976, Part." (1977): 87-101.

Mukiibi JK, editor. Agriculture in Uganda: Crops. Fountain Pub Limited; 2001. Vol.2,. 162-191.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjoast.v12i1.3665

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Research & Reviews: Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology