Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Performance Evaluation of Desi and Kabuli Type Chickpea Varieties at Hulbareg District Southern Ethiopia

Shimelis Mohammed, Mukerem Elias, Muhammed Sitot

Abstract


Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the third most important pulse crop and one of the major highland pulse crop widely grown in Ethiopia. They are two types of chickpea, called desi and kabuli. This study was conducted on Hulbareg district of Southern Ethiopia at 2020 cropping season. The field experiment was arranged a randomized complete block design with three replications to evaluate and select desi and kabuli type chickpea varieties for yield and adaptation. Analysis of variance for quantitative traits from desi type of chickpea varieties that revealed significant differences at (P ≤ 0.05) were from date of flowering, date of maturity, biological yield and grain yield; and highly significant differences at (P ≤ 0.01) were exhibited form plant height, number of pods plant-1, number of seed pod-1, number of seeds plant-1 and hundred seed weight. Analysis of variance for quantitative traits analyzed for five kabuli type chickpea varieties that exhibited significant differences at (P ≤ 0.05) were form number of pods plant-1, number of seed pod-1, number of seeds plant-1 and biological yield; and highly significant differences at (P ≤ 0.01) were observed form plant height, date of maturity, hundred seed weight and grain yield. From desi type chickpea varieties tested the highest mean grain yield was recorded by Minjar (3.31 t/ha) followed by Natoli (3.24 t/ha) and Dahota (3.23 t/ha). Varieties that give high yield advantage over local check were Minjar (45.3%), Natoli (44.1%) and Dahota (43.9%). These varieties could be used for production of chickpea at Hulbareg district and similar agro-ecologies as a variety choice from desi type chickpea. Dahota and Natoli varieties are large seeded so these are recommended for commercial farming. From Kabuli type Ejere was the highest in grain yield and 43.7% yield advantage from local check. Ejere variety could be used for production of chickpea at Hulbareg district and similar agro-ecologies as a variety choice from kabuli type chick pea varieties.


Keywords


Desi, Kabuli, Chickpea, Evaluation, Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT) (2009). Statistics. http://faostat.fao.org

Nawange, D.D., H.D. Verma, and H. Verma. "Growth and yield performance of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under different planting geometry and fertility levels in vindhya plateau region." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.5 (2018): 5291–5293.

Purushothaman, R., et al. "Kabuli and desi chickpeas differ in their requirement for reproductive duration." Field Crops Research 163 (2014): 24–31.

Castro, P., et al. "Fusarium wilt in chickpea: General aspect and molecular breeding." Fusarium: Epidemiology, Environmental Sources and Prevention; Rios, TF, Ortega, ER, Eds (2012):

–122.

Pande, S., et al. "Development of screening techniques and identification of new sources of resistance to Ascochyta blight disease of chickpea." Australasian Plant Pathology 40.2 (2011): 149–156.

Chaudhry, M.A., et al. "Sources of resistance in chickpea germplasm against fusarium wilt." Mycopath 5.1 (2007): 17–21.

CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2016) Agricultural sample survey report on area and production of crops private peasant holdings. Meher Season pp: 2–4.

CSA (Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey), (2018). Area and production of crops private peasant holdings, Maher season. Agricultural Statistics. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, statistical bullet 532 volume I.

Asnake F. Woldemedhin. 2016c. Progresses of chickpea research and development in Ethiopia. In Lijalem Korbu, Tebikew Damite and Asnake Fikre (eds). Harnessing Chickpea Value Chain for Nitrition Security and Commercialization of Smallholder Agriculture in Africa. Jan 30–2 Feb, Debere Zeit, Ethiopia.

MoA. Crop variety register, 2018. Ministry of Agriculture. Animal and Plant Health Directorate. Issue No. 21, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

SAS Institute Inc., (2002). SAS System for Windows Release 9.00. Cary, NC, USA.

Gomez, Kwanchai A., and Arturo A. Gomez. "Statistical procedures for agricultural research." (2010).

Goa, Yasin, et al. "Farmers’ participatory evaluation of chickpea varieties in Mirab Badwacho and Damot Fullasa districts of southern Ethiopia." Hydrology Current Research 8.1 (2017): 264.

Goa, Yasin, and Genene Gezahagn. "Introduction of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties through participatory variety selection: A case for Konta and Tocha Districts in Southern Ethiopia." Journal of Genetics and Genomes 2.1 (2018): 2–4.

Mohammed, Awol, et al. "Evaluation of Desi Type Chickpea Varieties for Adapting under Irrigation at Kobo, Ethiopia." (2020).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Research & Reviews: Journal of Crop Science and Technology