On the Nature of Reproductive Behaviour of Homo sapiens species: A Narrative Approach
Abstract
Monogamy and polygamy are the two reproductive structures for Homo sapiens which have been evolving millenia now rendering and stagnating into social construction rather than underlying in H. sapiens evolved nature. Anatomically, modern H. sapiens emerged and behaved, use energy to fullfill a physiological need, based on the information in their DNA here referred as “code”-driven behaviour; other species conscioulessness also behave on the basis of their genomes and here also some arguments were presented. H. sapiens since the evolution of an innerself or consicousness sustains a physiology which rests upon DNA encription with the difference that behaviours are the result of the mental process of deciding here referred as “choice”-driven behaviour. In the matter of reproductive behaviour, H. sapiens can choose monogamy or polygamy unlike other non-concious species known to this planet. Being the evolved nature of our species that is polygamy, our genomes should be preserved as such for our offspring to have the right to decide, being this the final argument in the matter of single or multiple partners. To become an unfair society will lead towards extinction of H. sapiens, either our species will return to a widespread, accepted and law-regulated polygamy or become generationally extinct. The manuscript also presented evidence which supports a non-specific, male-centered female subordinating polygamy as the prevalent reproductive structure for unconcious species of copulating taxons including only anatomically modern H. sapiens.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Stringer C. The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B. 2016; 371: 20150237.
Tattersall I. Human origins: Out of Africa. PNAS. 2009; 106(38): 16018–16021p.
Groucutt HS, Petraglia MD, Bailey G, et al. Rethinking the Dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa. Evolutionary Anthropology. 2015; 24: 149–164p.
5. Tononi G, Boly M, et al. Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2016; 17: 1–12p.
4. Koch C, Massimini M, et al. Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2016; 17: 307–321p.
Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, et al. A Theoretically Based Index of Consciousness Independent of Sensory Processing and Behavior. Consciousness. 2013; 5(198): 1–10p.
Sinitsyn DO, Poydasheva AG, Bakulin IS, et al. Detecting potential for Consciousness in Unresponsive Patients Using the Perturbational Complexity Index. Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(917): 1–12p.
Nani A, et al. The Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Attention: Two Sister Processes of the Brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019; 13: 1–17p.
Klein RG. Anatomy, Behavior, and Modern Human Origins. Journal of World Prehistory. 1995; 9(2): 167–198p.
Shea JJ, Sisk ML. Complex Projectile Technology and Homo sapiens Dispersal into Western Eurasia. PaleoAnthropology. 2010; 2010: 100–122p
Tutin CEG, et al. Foraging profiles of sympatric lowland gorillas and chimpanzees in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B. 1991; 334: 179–186p.
Tutin CEG. Mating Patterns and Reproductive Strategies in a Community of Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1979; 6: 29–38p.
Vásquez EF. SARS-CoV-2: A Simple, Cheap, Effective and Pollution-free Irradiation-based Prevention and Correction Approach. International Journal of Molecular Biotechnology. 2020; 6(1): 8–12p.
Vásquez EF. SARS-CoV-2: Basic Reproductive Number Ro is Unrealistic and Susceptible for Pandemic Mismanagement. International Journal of Molecular Biotechnology. 2020; 6(1): 27–34p.
United Nations. Population Facts: World Marriage Patterns. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2011; 1: 1–4p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjols.v11i2.3111
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.