Review article: Improvement of Permeate flux by Laboratory Scale Techniques in Membrane Separation Processes

Authors

  • Jigesh Pankaj Mehta Chemical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, P P Savani University, Kosamba, Surat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/jomcct.v10i1.1706

Keywords:

Mitigation, Flux, Laboratory scale, allied industries

Abstract

Membrane separation processes are found to be most effective and innovative technique in terms of separating the different attacking materials which are involved in mitigation of membrane filtration technique at some end. Various laboratory scale techniques are involved in the present era to meet the demands of current industrial requirements in terms of cost and quality. This article is an short review on three different flux enhancement techniques applied on laboratory scale found useful in delivering the proper solution to various feed ingredients which are to some extent creates difficulty to the allied industries.

Author Biography

  • Jigesh Pankaj Mehta, Chemical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, P P Savani University, Kosamba, Surat
    Assistant Professor,Chemical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, P P Savani University, Kosamba, Surat

References

Kaushik Nath, Membrane Separation Process, PHI learning pvt ltd, New Delhi, 2011.

G. Ducom, H. Matamoros, C. Cabassud. Air sparging for flux enhancement in nanofiltration membranes: application to O/W stabilised and non-stabilised emulsions. Journal of Membrane Science 2002; 204(1-2); 221–236.

N. Javadi, F.Z. Ashtiani, A. Fouladitajar, et al. Experimental studies and statistical analysis of membrane fouling behavior and performance in microfiltration of microalgae by a gas sparging assisted process. Bioresource Technology 2014; 162; 350–357.

A. Laorko, Z. Li, S. Tongchitpakdee, et al. Effect of gas sparging on flux enhancement and phytochemical properties of clarified pineapple juice by microfiltration. Separation and Purification Technology 2011; 80(3); 445–451.

C. Cabassud, S. Laborie, J.M. Laine. How slug flow can improve ultrafiltration flux in organic hollow fibres. Journal of Membrane Science 1997; 128(1); 93-101.

X. Shi, G. Tal, N.P. Hankins, et al. Fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2014; 1; 121–138.

M. Hemmati , F. Rekabdar , A. Gheshlaghi , et al. Effects of air sparging, cross flow velocity and pressure on permeation flux enhancement in industrial oily wastewater treatment using microfiltration. Desalination and Water Treatment 2012; 39(1-3); 33–40.

N. Yin, Z. Zhong, W. Xing. Ceramic membrane fouling and cleaning in ultrafiltration of desulfurization wastewater. Desalination 2013; 319; 92–98.

Z. Wang, F. Meng, X. He, et al. Optimisation and performance of NaClO-assisted maintenance cleaning for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water Research 2014; 53; 1-11.

K.R. Goode, K. Asteriadou, P.T. Robbins, et al. Fouling and Cleaning Studies in the Food and Beverage Industry Classified by Cleaning Type. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2013; 12(2); 121-143.

B.P. Espinasse, S. Chae, C. Marconnet, et al. Comparison of chemical cleaning reagents and characterization of foulants of nanofiltration membranes used in surface water treatment. Desalination 2012; 296; 1–6.

A.L. Ahmad, N.H. Mat Yasin, C.J.C. Derek, et al. Chemical cleaning of a cross-flow microfiltration membrane fouled by microalgal biomass. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 2014; 45(1); 233–241.

V. Naddeo, V. Belgiorno, L. Borea, et al. Control of fouling formation in membrane ultrafiltration by ultrasound irradiation. Environmental Technology 2015; 36(10); 1299–1307.

X. Li, J. Yu, A.G. Agwu Nnanna. Fouling mitigation for hollow-fiber UF membrane by sonication. Desalination 2011; 281; 23–29.

T.M. Patel, K. Nath. Alleviation of flux decline in cross flow nanofiltration of two-component dye and salt mixture by low frequency ultrasonic irradiation. Desalination 2013; 317; 132–141.

Y. Tao, D. Sun. Enhancement of Food Processes by Ultrasound: A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2015; 55(4); 570-594.

M.H. Shahraki, A. Maskooki, A.Faezian. Effect of various sonication modes on permeation flux in cross flow ultrafiltration membrane. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2014; 2(4); 2289–2294.

A. Mirzaie, T. Mohammadi. Effect of ultrasonic waves on flux enhancement in microfiltration of milk. Journal of Food Engineering 2012; 108(1); 77–86.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-24

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.