Response Surface Methodology for Improving Quicklime Production from Eggshell
Abstract
This study aimed to enhance the characteristics of quicklime by creating practical models based on experimental data. The research focused on analyzing the impact of three key factors during the calcination process: temperature, duration, and the size of eggshell particles. Two process models for RSM models were successfully created and validated. The residual errors between the actual values and the predicted values in the modeling validation runs were less than 5%, and they fell within the 95% prediction interval of the generated models. The study's findings indicate that the calcination temperature, calcination time, and eggshell particle size are the key variables that significantly affected the quicklime yield and reactivity. The RSM method demonstrates that a compromised configuration of calcination temperature of 945.91oC and calcination time of 180.82 min will still yield the desired results. will result in quicklime with an ideal yield of 99.6608%, an ideal level of 210 minutes at 895.03 degrees Celsius, and an ideal quicklime reactivity of 0.467835 degrees Celsius per second. would lessen the amount of downtime experienced by industries experiencing issues brought on by variations in the grade of quicklime purchased. The empirical response surface models (RSM) established in this study are valuable tools that quicklime manufacturers can employ to pinpoint the optimal calcination process parameters. Quicklime production is improved by these models in terms of both quantity and quality.References
Aggarwal, A., Singh H., Kumar, P., & Singh, M. (2009). Modelling of machining parameters and cooling conditions in hard turning of AISI P-20 tool steel using response surface methodology and desirability graphs, International Journal of Machining & Machinability of Materials, 4(1), 95-110.
Akande, H. F. (2015). Multiple Response Optimization of Quicklime Production from Limestone Using Design of Experiment. Minna: PhD Thesis Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria
Antonia, M., Bakolas, A., & Aggelakopoulou, E. (2000). The Effects Of Limestone Characteristics and Calcination Temperature to The Reactivity of the Quicklime. Cement and Concrete Research, 3-5.
Arias. J.L, Fink, D.J., Xiao, S. Q., Heuer, A.H., Caplan, A.I. (1993) Biomineralisation of eggshells: cell-mediated acellular compartments of mineralised extracellular matrix. lnt.Rev.Cytol. Vol. 145: 217-250.
Baziotis, I., Leontakianakos, G., Ekonomou, G., Delagrammatikas, G., Galbenis, C. T., & Tsimas, S. (2010). A Case Study of Different Limestones during Quicklime and Slaked-Lime Production. Geological Society of Greece, 3(4), 2-5.
Bello, N. M. (2015). Calcination Kinetics of Okpella Limestone from Thermogravimetric Data for Limes Production.Minna: Unpublished MEng Thesis Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.
Bhattacharya, T.K., Ghosh, A. & Das, S.K. (2001). Densification of Reactive Lime from Limestone. CeramicsInternational, 27(3), 455-459.
Borgwardt, R. H. (1985). Calcination Kinetics and Surface Area of Dispersed Limestone Particles. AIChE Journal, 31 (1), 103-111.
Borkowski, J. J., & Lucas, J. M. (1997). Designs of Mixed Resolution for Process Robustness Studies. Technometrics, 39(4), 63-70.
Borror, C. M., & Montgomery, D. C. (2000). Mixed Resolution Designs as Alternatives to Taguchi Inner/Outer Array Designs for Robust Design Problems. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16(3), 117-127.
Box, G.E. P. & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,13(1), 1–45.
Boynton, R. S. (1980). Chemistry and Technology of Lime and Limestone. New York: John Wiley& Sons Publishing, USA.
Dogu, G. & Mine. (2002). Calcination Kinetics of High Purity Limestones. Chemical Engineering Journal, 5, 1-2.
Foraminifera (2012). Hydrated Lime Production from Limestone in Nigeria How Viable. Retrieved from http://www.foramfera.com/index.php/investment-opportunities-in-nigeria/item/420.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |