Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Performance Evaluation of Lohmann Commercial Layer Breed in Peri-urban and Urban Areas of Cheha Woreda of SNNPR of Ethiopia

Yesuf Kedalla

Abstract


Performance evaluation of Lohmann commercial layer breed was conducted in peri-urban and urban areas of Cheha woreda. The objectives of the present study was to evaluate the performance of Lohmann layer breeds in urban and peri-urban areas of Cheha woreda and to determine the economic feasibility under farmers management condition to promote and disseminate the approved technology packages to the users. Participant farmers were selected purposively on the basis of willingness to construct poultry house and cover all the associated package costs. Training was given on poultry husbandry practice and data recording. A total of 500 day-old chicks were distributed with two month chicken ration. All chicks were vaccinated for Newcastle disease, Marek's disease, Gumboro disease and Fowl pox disease. Survival of chicks during the first eight weeks of age brooding by using electric light under farmers’ management condition was 83.3%. Mean egg at first laying date was 147.3±13.44 days and egg production performance of chicken was found to be 58.5–81.2% in the study area. Mean egg weight of Lohmann chicken was 43.92±1.50 g/egg, 51.67±4.23 g/egg and 56.93±2.86 g/egg at 5%, 50% and at peak production period, respectively. The partial budget analysis result indicated that Lohmann chicken breed production was profitable with an average benefit of 15618.3 Ethiopian Birr/participant on an average. The major challenges were lack of skill to manage the chicks, disease and predator attack (wild cat and shelemetmat). Even though farmers’ skills were observed to be less appropriate to manage the brooding, healthcare and feeding; Lohmann chicken breed showed good performance under farmers management condition.


Keywords


Lohmann commercial layer chicken breed, mortality, egg production, body weight of chicken, urban and peri-urban farmer’s management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Decision tools for family poultry development. Rome, Italy: FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 16; 2014.

Dwinger RH, Unger H. Improving farmyard poultry production in Africa: Interventions and their economic assessment. Vienna: Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture; 2004.

Aklilu H, Almekinders CJM, Van der Zijpp, AJ. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2007; 39: 165–168p.

Abdelqader A, Wollny CBA, Gauly M. Characterization of local chicken production system and potential under different level of management practice in Jordan. Journal of Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2007; 39: 55–164p.

Tadelle D. Study on Phenotypic and genetic characterization of chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia. Ph.D. Thesis. Germany: Humboldt University; 2003.

Alemu D, Degefe T, Nzietcheung S, Roy D. Overview and Background paper on Ethiopia's poultry sector: Relavance for HPAI research in Ethiopia. A Collaborative research Project, Africa/Indonesia Team Working paper No. 1. Washington, DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Royal Veterinary College (RVC); 2009. 709–715p.

Halima H, Neser FWC, Tadelle D, Kock AD, Van ME. Studies on the growth performance of native chicken ecotypes and RIR chicken under improved management system in Northwest Ethiopia. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2006; 36 (5): 76p.

Central Statistical Authority. Agricultural sample survey 2009, Report on livestock and livestock characteristics, Vol. II. Statistical Bulletin. Ethiopia: CSA; 2017. 585p.

Kondombo SR. Improvement of village chicken production in mixed (chicken–ram) farming system in Burkina Faso. Ph.D Thesis. Netherlands: Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University; 2005. 208p.

Alemu Y, Tadelle D. The status of poultry research and development in Ethiopia, research bulletin No.4, poultry commodity research program DebreZeit Agricultural research center. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP); 1998 May 14–15; Alemaya University of Agriculture. 141–150p.

Nigussie D, Van der Waaij LH, Dessie T, Van Arendonk JAM. Production objectives and Trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia: implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing indigenous chicken genetic resources. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010; 42: 1519–1529p.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Decision tools for family poultry development. FAO Animal production and Health Guidelines No. 16. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2014.

Habte M, Debele S. On-station and on-farm comparative performance evaluation of hay box chick brooder at Dilla University and Amaro Woreda, SNNPR of Ethiopia. American Journal of Research Communication. 2014; 2(8): 172–188p.

Sterling KG, Bell DD, Pesti GM, Aggrey SE. Relationships among strain, performance and environmental temperature in commercial laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2003; 12(1): 85–91p.

Alganesh T, Matewos B, Gizaw K. Survey on traditional livestock production systems in Manasibu district of West Wellega, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production; 2003 August 28–30; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 141–150p.

Oluyemi JA, Robert FA. Management and housing of adult chicken, in, poultry production in warm wet climates. USA: MacMillan Publishers; 1979. 49–106p.

Benyi K, Norris D, Tsatsinyane PM. Effect of stocking density and group size on the performance of white and brown Hyline layers in semi- arid conditions. Trop Animal Health Prod. 2006; 38(7–8): 619–624p.

Silversides FG, Scott TA. Effect of storage and layer age on quality of eggs from two lines of hens. Pout Sci. 2001; 80:1240–1245p.

Sorenson P. Results of the German Random Sample Test 1995/1996. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1997. 239–249p.

Demeke S. Egg production performance of local and White Leghorn hens under intensive and rural household conditions in Ethiopia. Livestock Res Rural Dev. 2004; 16: 1–13p.

Solomon D. Study on the egg production of White Leghorn under intensive, semi-intensive and rural household conditions in Ethiopia. Livest Resour Rural Dev. 1996; 8: 89–92p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.