Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Performance Evaluation of Dominant Red Barred D922 Breed at Peri-urban Areas of Gurage Zone in SNNPR of Ethiopia

Yesuf Kedalla, Dinku Getu, Eyob Tagese

Abstract


Animal production in general and chickens in particular play important socioeconomic roles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of red barred dual breeds in peri-urban areas of the Gurage zone and to determine the economic feasibility under farmers’ management conditions to promote and disseminate the approved technology packages to the users. Participant farmers were selected purposively on the basis of willingness to cover all associated package costs. The training was given on poultry houses and housing, health care, feed and feeding, and data recording. A total of 350 red barred dual day old chicks including mortality allowance were distributed with two-month feed and chicks were vaccinated for NCDs, Marek’s, Gumboro, and Fowl pox diseases. Survival of chicks during the first 8 weeks of age under peri-urban farmer’s management condition was 79.4%. Mean body weight at 8 weeks of age, red barred dual breed under farmers’ management condition was 563.3±9 g/chick and at 20 weeks, the body weight was 1237.9±108 gm/pullets and 1450±38.6 g/cockerels. Average egg at first laying date was 217 days. The egg production performance of chicken was found to be 48.8% at first production and grows to 61% in case of peak production phase up to the end of data collection (60 weeks of age). Mean egg weight was 45.2±2.8, 53.8±1.2, and 60.3±2.9 gm at 5%, 50%, and peak production stage respectively. Even though farmers’ skills were observed less to appropriately manage the brooding, healthcare, and feeding red barred chicken breed found good in adaptation and productivity under peri-urban farmers management conditions.


Keywords


Animal production, fowl pox disease, red barred dual breeds, red barred dual-purpose chicken breed, production performance, and peri-urban farmers’ management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alders R. Poultry for Profit and Pleasure. FAO Diversification Booklet 3. Rome, Italy: FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations); 2004.

Salam KR. Improvement of Village Chicken Production in a Mixed (Chicken-Ram) Farming System in Burkina Faso. [Ph.D Thesis]. The Netherlands: Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University; 2005.

Aklilu H, Almekinders CJM, Van der Zijpp AJ. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2007; 39(3): 165–168.

Van Eekeren N, Maas A, Saatkamp HW, Verschuur M. Small-Scale Chicken Production. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Agrodoc 4. Agromisa Foundation and CTA; 2006.

Abdelqader A, Wollny CBA, Gauly M. Characterization of local chicken production system and potential under different level of management practice in Jordan. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2007; 39(3): 155–164.

Tadelle D. Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Chicken Ecotypes in Ethiopia. [Ph.D. Thesis]. Germany: Humboldt University; 2003.

CSA (Central Statistical Authority). Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Private Peasant Holdings). Agricultural Sample Survey; Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2015.

Mebratu GY. Experiences from an FAO Poultry Development Project in Ethiopia. In: Sonaiya EB, (editor). Proceeding of an International Workshop on Sustainable Rural Poultry Production in Africa. International livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 1997; 57–65.

Alemu Y, Tadelle D. The Status of Poultry Research and Development in Ethiopia, Research Bulletin No.4, Poultry Commodity Research. 1997. Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). May 14–15, 1998. pp. 141–150.

Hailemariam Teklewold, Legesse Dadi, Alemu Yami, Negusse Dana. Adopting poultry breeds in the highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR). Research Report 65. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2006. Http://www.Googlewww.fews.net/livelihoods

Nigussie D, Van der Waaij LH, Dessie T, Van Arendonk JAM. Production objectives and trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia: implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing indigenous chicken genetic resources. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010; 42(7): 1519–1529.

Aman G, Melese Y, Mesfin M, Addisu J, Mebratu A, Asrat T, Endrias D. Demonstration and evaluation of dual purpose chicken “Potchefstroom Koekoek” packages at Areka areas, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (GJSFR): Agriculture and Veterinary. 2016; 16(2): 37–42.

Meseret M. Characterization of Village Chicken Production and Marketing System in Gommawereda, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. [M.Sc. Thesis]. Ethiopia: Jimma University; 2010.

Chali Terefe Tol, Wasihun Hassen Abat, Solomon Demek. On-Station and On-Farm Evaluation of Three Exotic Breeds of Chicken in Homa District of West Wollega, Ethiopia. Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine; 2020.

Aman G, Addisu J, Mebratu A, Kebede H, Bereket Z, Teklayohannes B. Management Practices and Productive Performances of Sasso Chickens Breed under Village Production System in SNNPR. Ethiopia: South Agricultural Research Institute, Areka Agricultural Research; 2017.

Kasa Biratu, Saba Haile. Demonstration and performance evaluation of “Potchefstroom Koekoek” chicken package at Jimma zone, South Western Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare (JBAH). 2016; 6(15): 53–58.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.